An argument is only as good as the weakest link a court will find. Keeping the proposition, the authority and the evidence beside one another is how the weak link gets found first.
Customer goodwill alone does not establish irreparable harm.
P1 Evidence shows quantifiable lost revenue.
P2 Plaintiff delayed seeking relief.
A3Salinger v. Colting, 607 F.3d 68.
THE PRODUCT PRINCIPLE
Strong litigation work connects the proposition, the authority and the evidentiary record.
Break the motion into its elements, hold the record beside the draft, and keep each paragraph traceable to what supports it. Where verified case-law retrieval would do the searching, the product is explicit that the connection is not yet made.
Structure before prose
Briefs fail on structure more often than on writing. The elements come first.
Elements and burdens
Break a motion or claim into the elements that must be satisfied and who carries the burden on each.
Standard of review
Fix the posture and the standard at the start, so the analysis is written to the test the court will actually apply.
Issue-level assignments
Take one element at a time as a scoped request rather than asking for a brief in a single pass.
A named deliverable
Each run ends in a defined output — an argument section, an issue list, a memorandum — that goes into the editor.
The record, close at hand
What distinguishes litigation drafting is that the evidence is as contested as the law.
Exhibits in context
Upload the documents the dispute turns on and put specific ones into the request rather than describing them.
Passage-level grounding
Structured review across the record records the passage behind each extracted value, so a factual assertion can be checked.
Extract across a document set
Ask the same question of a set of filings, correspondence or agreements and compare the answers in one table.
Evidence and authority stay distinct
Matter documents and published law are handled separately, so a reviewer can see which is supporting which.
Drafting you can defend
Everything that reaches a filing has an attorney's name on it. The drafting surface is built on that assumption.
Nothing changes silently
Proposed edits to an argument are displayed apart from the text and applied only when accepted.
Version checkpoints
A restructuring that did not work can be reversed, and the version restored from is itself preserved.
Real DOCX export
Export with legal paper and layout into the chain the filing already goes through.
Verification stays with counsel
No citation the model produces is treated as verified. Confirming authority remains the attorney's own step.
IN PRACTICE
The work lawyers bring to it.
Opposition to a preliminary injunction
Work the four factors as separate scoped assignments and assemble the sections once each one holds.
Motion to dismiss
Break the complaint into its elements and test which are actually pleaded before drafting the argument.
Discovery set review
Run a defined question set across produced documents and build a structured, checkable table.
Test the other side's theory
Ask for the strongest version of the opposing argument and draft against it rather than against a weak one.
Cite-check your own draft
Walk each proposition back to what supports it and find the sentences with nothing behind them.
HOW THE WORK MOVES
A visible record from input to review.
01Procedural posture
02Elements and burdens
03Record review
04Analysis
05Argument draft
06Attorney review
IN THE WORKSPACE TODAY
What you can use now.
Not yet available: Case-law search and negative treatment; Citation linking to a source record; Docket and court filing systems.
Scoped issue-level assignments
Matter-bound requests with explicit source selection.
Live
Document review across the record
Structured runs with exact-passage grounding.
Live
Drafting with accept/reject and version history
Proposals, checkpoints and undoable restore.
Live
DOCX export
Real Word output with legal page setup.
Live
Astra for Law
Legal model integration coming soon
◆
PRIVATE BETA
Keep the research visible. Keep the document yours.