Astra for Law
View platformOpen workspace
Astra for Law
Open workspace

SOLUTIONS / LITIGATION

Build the argument with the record in view.

Move from facts and procedural posture to authority, argument structure and an editable brief section.

Explore the workspace View platform
Secure access required · source retrieval in development
ARGUMENT MAP

Customer goodwill alone does not establish irreparable harm.

P1 Evidence shows quantifiable lost revenue.

P2 Plaintiff delayed seeking relief.

A3 Salinger v. Colting, 607 F.3d 68.

THE PRODUCT PRINCIPLE

Strong litigation work connects the proposition, the authority and the evidentiary record.

A visible argument map lets lawyers test each step, locate contrary law and trace a draft paragraph back to controlling authority and matter evidence.

Appellate courtroom with judicial bench and mahogany podium
Deep argument mapping, element breakdown, and controlling authority records
01

Issue structure

Break motions and claims into elements, burdens and standards of review.

02

Authority record

Distinguish controlling, persuasive, contrary and matter-specific support.

03

Brief-ready output

Draft sections with citations and a clear attorney revision trail.

HOW THE WORK MOVES

A visible record from input to review.

  1. 01Procedural posture
  2. 02Issues and elements
  3. 03Authority search
  4. 04Evidence mapping
  5. 05Argument draft
  6. 06Attorney review

CONTEXT & CONNECTIONS

Designed to work with the systems legal teams rely on.

Integration labels describe the intended architecture, not a claim that every connection is currently available.

Court opinionsplannedMatter recordplannedDMS architectureplannedMicrosoft Wordplanned

ASTRA FOR LAW

Keep the research visible.
Keep the document yours.

Open the secure workspace